IV. Break language boundary, language for mutual communication, language for mutual understanding
[My comments]: Honestly, Chinglish is really hard to understand for those foreigners who do not understand Chinese cultural or do never visit China. On the other hand, this is a common problem, because different peoples try to make “Englishes” become their own and serve their life in communication and understanding. But it’s impossible to ask native speakers or non-native speakers to learn all these “Englishes” without deeper understanding the local culture. However, are there possible ways to reduce language boundary to facilitate mutual understanding and communication? Here my suggestion is that if you can’t master English, try Globish!
1. What is Globish?
Globish is a version of the English language that uses only the most common 1500 English words. It recognizes, and forms a system for organization of, the actual English used by non-English-speakers of varying native languages when communicating with each other or with Anglophones.
Unlike many subsets of English constructed by English speakers for various purposes (Special English, Basic English), Globish is derived by non-native English speakers from the common practices they instinctively adopt when using English as a “middle ground” between many cultures. However, because only 1500 basic words define Globish, it becomes far simpler for novices to absorb those specific spellings and pronunciations than with conventional means of language learning. When using Globish, the recommendation is to stick to simple short sentences, which does not prevent the result from still being correct English; it just achieves an immediate understanding hit rate far better with, or among, non-native speakers, and does not impair the communication with Anglophones.
(More information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globish)
2. How: ( from)http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/04/21/features/Blume22.php
PARIS: It happens all the time: during an airport delay the man to the left, a Korean perhaps, starts talking to the man opposite, who might be Colombian, and soon they are chatting away in what seems to be English. But the native English speaker sitting between them cannot understand a word.
They don’t know it, but the Korean and the Colombian are speaking Globish, the latest addition to the 6,800 languages that are said to be spoken across the world. Not that its inventor, Jean-Paul Nerrière, considers it a proper language.
“It is not a language, it is a tool,” he says. “A language is the vehicle of a culture. Globish doesn’t want to be that at all. It is a means of communication.”
Nerrière doesn’t see Globish in the same light as utopian efforts such as Kosmos, Volapuk, Novial or staunch Esperanto. Nor should it be confused with barbaric Algol (for Algorithmic language). It is a sort of English lite: a means of simplifying the language and giving it rules so it can be understood by all.
“The language spoken worldwide, by 88 percent of mankind, is not exactly English,” Nerrière says. “I don’t think people who think this gives them an edge is right because it’s not useful if they cannot be understood by English speakers.” His primer, Parlez Globish, is an attempt to codify worldspeak and since its publication by Eyrolles in Paris last year, he says, his Web site www.jpn-globish.com has had almost 36,000 hits.
A retired IBM marketing executive, Nerrière speaks excellent English but switches to Globish if he is not getting through. “I look at their faces. Lack of understanding is very easy to decipher.”
The main principles of Globish are a vocabulary of only 1,500 words in English (the OED lists 615,000), gestures and repetition. Grammar will be dealt with in the next volume, “Découvrez le Globish,” due next month.
The Web site also includes song lyrics because Nerrière reckons this is an excellent way to learn words, even if they are not on the Globish 1,500. “Strangers in the Night” is one choice, but what is the student to do when Sinatra goes “scoobie-doobie-do”?
“Doesn’t matter,” Nerrière replies buoyantly. “I saw ‘A Chorus Line’ three or four times on Broadway and I know all the songs by heart. I never understood the line ‘If Troy Donahue can be a movie star you can be a movie star,’ but I managed to reproduce it well enough in a way it could be understood.”
The point, he says, is to reach the threshold of understanding. But neither threshold nor understanding is on the 1,500-word list. “In Globish it would be the target, the goal, the objective. I use three words to reach the point where you would be understood everywhere.”
The list goes from “able” to “zero.” Niece and nephew, for example, are not included, “but you can replace them with the children of my brother,” Nerrière says. He feels he erred in putting in both beauty and beautiful and in including “much” and “many” but not “lot.”
“Much is for ideas, many is for things you can count. A lot works for both cases, the others require a little more understanding.”
The seeds for Globish came about in the 1980s when Nerrière was working for IBM in Paris with colleagues of about 40 nationalities. At a meeting where they were to be addressed by two Americans whose flight had been delayed, they started exchanging shoptalk in what Nerrière calls “une certaine forme d’anglais perverti.” Then the Americans arrived and beyond their opening phrases, “Call me Jim,” “Call me Bill,” no one understood a word. And Jim and Bill, needless to say, did not understand perverted English.
One might say that, except for Jim and Bill of course, everyone was speaking Globish though they didn’t know it. “They all, like me, spoke low-quality English, not really Globish. One might have a vocabulary of 2,000 words, another of 1,200 and not the same words. One of the things of interest in Globish is that with 1,500 words you can express everything. People all over the world will speak with the same limited vocabulary.”
With many corporations imposing English as the lingua franca wherever their base, Nerrière sees a great future for Globish, which he has trademarked. Learning it by computer and practicing it by free-access telephone will make things even easier. And there is a new law in France that gives employees the right to 20 hours per year of instruction in a given subject.
“The idea is to increase their employability by teaching them skills unrelated to their present employment. For me, the odds of someone asking for a course in macramé are very small and the odds of asking for a course in Maltese are also small. Why not Globish? If it could be of use in this small grocery shop where I work maybe it will help me in the big hotel where I hope to be.”
is an other advantage, he argues. “At 20 hours a year you need 24 years to learn English with no result whatsoever since it would be spread too thin for the learner to remember what had been said two weeks earlier. With Globish you not only have free telephone access via the Internet but you could get cheap lessons in places like India where people speak good English and wages are low.”
Nerrière reckons that with 182 hours plus learning “Strangers in the Night,” the student should be able to communicate in Globish. It is not a pretty language – full of redundancies and lumpy constructions – but Nerrière repeats that it is nothing but a tool when proper English is not understood. “It is not the language of Hamlet, Faulkner or Virginia Woolf,” he explains.
But the worst thing for the French about this international language is that it isn’t French. Nerrière argues rather subtly that if people learned Globish, the French language would remain unsullied because franglais would die out.
“It would end this crazy French terror about English and francophonie. The French say you are killing the French language and I say, no, we are saving it from being killed by English.”
There is one possible hiccup in this scheme. The fluent Globish speaker will not be understood by native English speakers. No problem: Nerrière already is preparing a Globish version in English in addition to the Italian and Spanish editions, which will be out shortly. So he is not only protecting French from invasion but he is getting Americans to become, so to speak, bilingual.
“Absolutely!” Nerrière says triumphantly. “This is the way to get Americans to learn another language.”
External links:
http://www.jpn-globish.com/file/1500motsGlobish.pdf
http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/vangogh/555/Spell/globish.html
http://www.globish.com/
